The quest for a standardized attachment system has been ongoing in the world of firearms, with multiple companies vying for dominance in this arena. In 2012, Noveske Rifleworks and VLTOR Weapon Systems collaborated to create an open-source design for KeyMod, hoping to bring some much-needed unity to the industry.

Since then, both KeyMod and M-LOK have gained immense popularity as mounting systems. But what sets them apart from each other? And which one is better suited to your needs?

KeyMod's slot system offers a smoother surface compared to traditional rail systems like Picatinny, providing even more options for attaching accessories such as lights, lasers, grips, and others. However, this design choice has also led to complaints about the added weight and bulk of these systems.

For many years, the Picatinny rail was the gold standard for attaching various accessories to firearms. While it did get the job done, it wasn't without its drawbacks. The rough surface and limited mounting options were just a few of the issues that plagued shooters.

The advent of KeyMod and M-LOK has brought about significant improvements in terms of functionality and user experience. Both systems use a slot system, which allows for more precise placement and attachment of accessories. This design change has made it easier to manage weight and bulk, creating a more streamlined shooting experience.

In conclusion, when it comes to attaching KeyMod accessories, users can expect a smoother surface and increased mounting options compared to traditional rail systems. However, the added weight and bulk may be a drawback for some shooters. Ultimately, the choice between KeyMod and M-LOK will depend on individual preferences and needs.

Attaching keymod accessories